The authors could take a civil action for damages against the State in a District Court at first instance, if necessary, on appeal in the Court of Appeal, and subject to leave to appeal in the Supreme Court.

Singapore Singapore Court of Appeal

The Court dismissed the appeal.

2.7 On 28 June 1999, the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal.

On appeal, the Frankfurt Court of Appeal quashed that decision and referred the matter back to the Frankfurt Regional Court.

The Court of Appeal of Quebec rejected the appeal against the conviction and the Supreme Court of Canada refused the application for leave to appeal against this decision.

Yet the Court of Cassation found that that ground had been discussed in the Appeal Court.

President of the Appeal Penal Court Damascus

On 6 October 2000, upon appeal, the Borgarting Court of Appeal upheld this decision.

2.9 On 2 October 2000, the Frankfurt Court of Appeal dismissed the authors' immediate appeal, in the absence of a legal error in the impugned decision of the Frankfurt Regional Court.

He appealed to the High Court and subsequently to the Court of Appeal.

The legal system comprises a Court of Appeal, a Supreme Court and a Magistrate's Court, with a final appeal procedure lying open to the Privy Council of the United Kingdom.

On 19 November 1999, the Supreme Court rejected the author's application and on 24 December 1999, rejected his appeal from the Court of Appeal.

She appealed to the Paris Court of Appeal.

1990 1993 Judge, Gulating Lagmannsrett (appeal court), Bergen

Nevertheless, the Supreme Court dismissed the authors' appeal.

The Tunis court of appeal upheld that judgement.

The Supreme Court of Canada allowed the appeal of Monsanto in part.

The Court of Appeal considered the evidence in respect of each appellant.

In the appeal to the Supreme Court, his claim was similarly dismissed.

The Supreme Court of Canada denied leave to appeal.

In a judgement of 9 May 2001, the Constitutional Court rejected the appeal.

On 29 October 2002, they filed a cassation appeal in the Minsk City Court the appeal was dismissed on 28 November 2002.

The Federal Court of Appeal ruling may be appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada.

Appeared before Canada's Federal Court and Federal Court of Appeal on administrative and security intelligence matters

The Court of Appeal denied the applicability of article 44 CISG in the case and the Supreme Court upheld the decision.

The Supreme Court of Canada has granted leave to appeal.

Canada Quebec Court of Appeal (Vallerand, Rothaman and Mailhot JJ.A.

Canada Alberta Court of Appeal (Kerans, Hetherington, and Irving JJ.

Canada Federal Court of Appeal (Heald, Mahoney and Stone JJ.

On 19 February 1999, the Federal Court dismissed the appeal.

The author appealed to the Court of Appeal for Ontario.

On 19 June 1989, the Constitutional Court dismissed the appeal.

The Court of Appeal dismissed his appeal and the Chief Justice confirmed the death sentence on 30 January 1997.

3.1 The author claims that his hearing before the Court of Appeal was contrary to article 14 as two of the judges who rendered judgement in this appeal, also sit on the Utrecht Regional Court.

2.3 The author appealed to the Hague Court of Appeal and, at the beginning of the hearing, sought referral of the case to another Court of Appeal, for the same reason as in 2.2 above.

Judges Van der Reep and Veger, who rendered judgement in the Court of Appeal case, also sit on the Utrecht Regional Court.

The author's appeal to the Supreme Court was declared inadmissible on 26 September 1996, and an appeal to the Constitutional Court was dismissed on procedural grounds on 7 October 1998.

2.8 SCI Le Praley and Mr. Deperraz appealed these rulings in the Chambéry Appeal Court.

The Appeal Court, however, upheld the rulings in two separate decisions on 24 September 1996.

2.5 In its decision of 29 September 1998, the Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible.

Application for leave to appeal was denied by the Supreme Court.

The results of the appeal to the Supreme Court are pending.

Canada Alberta Court of Appeal (Fraser, Conrad JJ. A., Picard J.)

Canada British Columbia Court of Appeal (Lambert, Wood and Hollinrake JJ.A.