His application was rejected.

Their application was rejected.

This new application was rejected on 15 October 2002.

Her application for full exemption from the CKREE subject was rejected.

Lastly, her application to the Constitutional Court for amparo was also rejected.

The Court rejected the application.

The author subsequently filed a new application for reconsideration and it too was rejected.

The lower court rejected the application.

The author filed an application for review of that decision, an application that was rejected by the court on 7 July 1998.

The application was rejected by the Federal Office for Refugees by decision dated 10 January 2002.

His asylum application was rejected by the Swedish Migration Board on 21 February 2001 and his appeal of that decision was rejected by the Aliens Appeals Board on 3 June 2002.

For want of details, and in the absence of any justification for his allegations, his application was rejected.

2.3 The author lodged an amparo application before the Constitutional Court, which was rejected on 29 January 1997.

Therefore, they applied for full exemption for Kevin from CKREE subject in the autumn 1997 the application was rejected.

2.8 On 26 May 1997 the Constitutional Court rejected the application.

When his complaint was rejected at the lower court and appeal levels, the author filed an application for amparo with the Constitutional Court.

Lastly, the authors filed an application for amparo with the Constitutional Court, which was rejected in October 1998 as being devoid of substance.

2.3 On 26 May 1997 Madrid Social Court No. 3 rejected his application.

On 13 December 2002, the case was heard by the high court of the Guadalajara de Buga judicial district, which rejected the complainant's application.

On 19 November 1999, the Supreme Court rejected the author's application and on 24 December 1999, rejected his appeal from the Court of Appeal.

On 25 November 1996, the court rejected an application for review filed by the author.

The Commission found the application manifestly groundless in a decision dated 10 October 2002. It rejected the application in a ruling dated 13 November 2002.

2.3 In a judgement dated 27 January 1999, the Supreme Court rejected the application for annulment.

2.8 On 7 May 2001, the Minister of Justice rejected the author's application for a retrial.

Justice Wilcox rejected the applicant's argument that the consideration of an application for registration was a service as contemplated by section 22 of the Sex Discrimination Act.

On 30 October 2000, RRT cancelled the decision to refuse the second application for a protection visa, on the ground that the second application was invalid and that RRT thus had no jurisdiction. On 8 November 2000, a fourth request under section 417 was made, which was rejected on 11 December 2001.

2.5 On 22 August 2000, the second application for a protection visa was rejected as the complainant had not established a real fear of persecution if returned to Sri Lanka.

Her application to the Supreme Court for a judicial review was rejected because she could have submitted the new document on which she based her case at an earlier stage.

The arbitral tribunal provided for in the statutes of association rejected the claimant's application to have the reorganisation overturned.

The State party argues that the dangers alleged by the complainant had already been reviewed thoroughly and fairly under domestic procedures counsel acknowledges that OFPRA rejected the complainant's application for refugee status on what grounds counsel does not know, since the application was refused while the complainant was in prison.

4.5 On 21 February 2001, the Migration Board rejected the application for asylum and ordered the complainant's expulsion to Bangladesh.

The author filed an application for amparo with the Constitutional Court, which was rejected on 25 October 1999 on the grounds that the court of first instance had already resolved the matter.

When his daughter Maria (born on 3 March 1991) started to attend Lesterud School in Bærum in the autumn of 1997, an application for full exemption from the CKREE subject was filed on her behalf, which was rejected.

It was rejected in December 2003.

The lawyers' request was, however, rejected.

4.4 On 19 July 2001, the Migration Board rejected the complainant's application for asylum and ordered that he be deported to Ecuador.

On 12 November 2002, the Danish Board of Appeal rejected the author's application for leave to appeal against the High Court's judgement.

The application was refused.

(c) Despite the safeguards in place, the Parliamentary Ombudsman reported on one recent case of an asylum seeker whose application had been rejected and who was subsequently allegedly subjected to torture in his country of origin

His application was rejected, and he maintains that sending him back to Pakistan would constitute a violation by Switzerland of article 3 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.

The Court of Appeal, for its part, rejected the corporation's application to file additional evidence on the basis that it was beyond the narrow question framed by the corporation in the lower courts and on appeal.

This application was also denied.

On 8 January 2000, this request was rejected.

This request was rejected on 6 August 2004.

That really was a killer application.