17. Legal claim in respect of the rations contract (paragraph 13).

The failure to claim it in the contract, however, is regarded as an implicit forfeiture of that right.

In the view of OIOS, the contractor's claim is premature because the contract work is only about 52 per cent complete.

payment claim against the defendant since the repaired furniture did not conform with the contract and this amounted to a fundamental breach of the contract which gave the defendant the right to declare the contract avoided (article 49(1)(a) CISG).

With respect to the damages claim for the non performance of the sales contract, the arbitral tribunal held that the contract could be declared void and damages could be claimed under article 45(2).

The seller had therefore the right to declare the contract avoided under article 64 CISG and to claim damages in the amount corresponding to the difference between the contract price and the price of the substitute transaction under article 75 CISG.

Due to an alleged failure from ENTEL to comply with the contract terms, the company filed an administrative claim against ENTEL in 1987, which was dismissed in May 1988.

Thereafter, the servant is his some claim that there is a contract but, in reality, neither party has any rights or obligations with regard to the other.

In this connection, the Division engaged in mediation of a contract claim with a view to reassessing the benefits of this dispute settlement mechanism and its appropriateness for the United Nations.

The contractor had submitted a claim for compensation and had requested an eight month contract extension to complete the construction work by February 2006.

The court, pursuant to article 19(3) CISG, found that there was no clear agreement between the parties and therefore no distribution contract for 1992 and rejected the claim for damages based on a breach of contract theory.

On 28 December 1990, the company filed an independent claim in the National Supreme Court of Justice (Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación), which in June 1992, decided that it lacked jurisdiction and that the complainant company should have filed its claim in the local courts established in the contract.

The Court rejected the claim that the contract was governed by German law, under which the claim was time barred, holding that a German choice of law clause in the vendor's general terms of sale was never brought to the attention of the buyer or put in its possession.

The non payment of invoices in respect of the provision of goods and services that were not specified in the contract has led to the submission of a legal claim by the vendor.

Change in contract terms.

That's in the contract.

THE E2 CLAIM Background to the E2 claim The E2 claim in this instalment was initially filed in category D .

Accordingly, a possible claim for damages for the delivery of goods not conforming with the contract could be based on articles 45(1)(b) and 74 CISG.

1. In a claim by the assignee against the debtor for payment of the assigned receivable, the debtor may raise against the assignee all defences and rights of set off arising from the original contract, or any other contract that was part of the same transaction, of which the debtor could avail itself as if the assignment had not been made and such claim were made by the assignor.

At the request of Saudi Arabia, the secretariat incorporated that claim in the current claim (Claim No. 5000463).

The claim preparers were often listed as the contact persons in the claim files and some claim files included attestations from the claim preparers opining on the merits of the claim.

(Claim by retired United Nations staff member that, by offering her a series of short term contracts or Special Service Agreements instead of a permanent contract, the United Nations had prevented her from acquiring pension rights. Claim for compensation on the ground that the United Nations abused its discretionary power by yielding to pressure by the Czech authorities not to grant her a permanent contract)

The first claim unit is for reduction in crop yields and the second claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

Second claim unit Claim preparation costs Saudi Arabia seeks compensation in the amount of USD 5,874 for claim preparation costs.

(a) In a claim by the assignee against the account debtor for payment of the assigned receivable, the account debtor may raise against the assignee all defences and rights of set off arising from the original contract, or any other contract that was part of the same transaction, of which the account debtor could avail itself as if the assignment had not been made and such claim were made by the assignor

(b) in a written contract or

Don't sign the contract in pencil.

We would like to bring to the attention of the Commission two questions whether the phrase in connection with the formation or performance of a contract in paragraph 1 appropriately reflects the intention of the Working Group, and whether that phrase covers, for example, cases involving notice of cargo receipt , notice of claim compensation and notice of contract termination .

It further held that the respondent could set off against the claimant a claim resulting from the breach of the relevant sales contract but not from the general distribution agreement.

Contract?

The deferred part of claim No. 5000379 has been included in claim No. 5000301.

She put in her claim.

One of the defendants contested the claim on three grounds error, lack of conformity of the goods to the contract terms and disproportionate value of the obligations between the opposing parties.

In some instances, the Panel examined one E4 claim in relation to more than one individual claim.

In other instances, the Panel examined an individual claim in relation to more than one E4 claim.

The property insurance contract mentioned in this Section is briefly referred to as the contract , unless specified otherwise.

We got a contract in Fort Morris.

Third claim unit Claim preparation costs Jordan seeks compensation in the amount of USD 1,700,000 for claim preparation costs for its fourth and fifth F4 instalment claims, including its public health claim.

The reason for this view seem to be that otherwise the carrier will be put in a better position compared to an shipment under a cost, insurance, freight , or CIF sale where the carrier may only claim compensation from the shipper (i.e. the seller under the sales contract), but not the consignee (i.e. the buyer under the sales contract).

It applies to the framework volume contract and the individual shipments under that contract as specified in article 4.

The initial contract had to be cancelled because the company could not provide the services stipulated in the contract.

Contract award

A contract.

The contract?

Another contract.