Individuals who feel they have been subjected to labour discrimination may file the appropriate claim with the courts.

6.5 As to the State party's claim that the authors failed to exhaust domestic remedies in relation to his claim of prohibited discrimination, the Committee recalls that the authors did not invoke the specific issue of discrimination before the Czech courts accordingly, they have not exhausted domestic remedies in this respect.

What was the basis for the report's claim that no discrimination existed in dealing with the population's health problems?

This separate opinion emphasizes that a claim of discrimination which raises an issue of substance requiring consideration on the merits should be found admissible.

The employer's representative's claim that men would not work for a lower wage also indicated that this was a case of direct discrimination.

While his country, along with the rest of the international community, could claim that de jure discrimination against women had been eliminated, de facto discrimination still existed in many societies, largely because of certain attitudes and values.

The claim of unlawful discrimination is maintained even though Portugal's influence and control within Angola in this time period was waning, if not eclipsed.

As a result, neither Roma nor other inhabitants of Dobšiná can claim a violation of their right to adequate housing or discrimination resulting from such resolutions.

As regards systematic discrimination, there is provision in both legislation which deals with discrimination on grounds of sex (the Sex Discrimination Act 1975, as amended, and the legislation which deals with discrimination on the grounds of race (the Race Relations Act 1976, as amended) which enables persons who claim to be victims of such discrimination to apply to a tribunal or, in some cases, to a court for the award of compensation.

The deferred part of claim No. 5000458 is reviewed as part of the second claim unit (terrestrial resources) of this claim.

The claim preparers were often listed as the contact persons in the claim files and some claim files included attestations from the claim preparers opining on the merits of the claim.

They drew attention to the fact that discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation was widely practised and that persons suffering such discrimination were more exposed to human rights violations and were less likely to claim their rights and obtain remedies.

At the request of Saudi Arabia, the secretariat incorporated that claim in the current claim (Claim No. 5000463).

7.4 Turning to the major claim that the omission of political belief from the enumerated grounds of prohibited discrimination in the Ontario Code violates the Covenant, the Committee observes that an absence of protection against discrimination on this ground does raise issues under the Covenant.

The State party concludes that the authors have failed to substantiate, for purposes of admissibility, their claim that they are victims of discrimination, in violation of article 26 of the Covenant.

This claim was originally part of category F3 claim No. 5000194.

Second claim unit Claim preparation costs Saudi Arabia seeks compensation in the amount of USD 5,874 for claim preparation costs.

The claim comprises four claim units with an asserted value of USD 161,000,000.

10. Date of claim _

Sixth claim unit Claim preparation costs Iran seeks compensation in the amount of USD 4,500,000 for administrative, technical and legal expenses of the preparation of this claim.

The deferred part of claim No. 5000379 has been included in claim No. 5000301.

This claim is the deferred portion of claim No. 5000259 relating to remediation of coastal mudflats.

Third claim unit Claim preparation costs Jordan seeks compensation in the amount of USD 1,700,000 for claim preparation costs for its fourth and fifth F4 instalment claims, including its public health claim.

Recommended award for claim No. 5000301 Claim No. 5000288 Other resources Claim No. 5000288 comprises six claim units, with a total asserted value of USD 7,916,024,475, for losses resulting from Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

The sixth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The fifth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The third claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

According to the Gender Equality Act a person can claim damages for discrimination in cases when his or her right not to be discriminated against has been violated.

The elements of Claim No. 5000309 were originally part of claim 5000208 in the F2 claims category.

The Ministry of Agriculture and Water of Saudi Arabia originally submitted this claim unit as claim 5000207.

Moreover, it seems evident that no State can lay claim to perfection, since manifestations of intolerance and discrimination based on religion or belief have arisen in all countries, albeit to different degrees.

Recommended award for claim No. 5000468 Claim No. 5000183 Public health Claim No. 5000183 comprises four claim units, with a total asserted value of USD 1,476,336,427, for losses resulting from damage or risk of damage to public health.

First, the claim for discrimination is based on the erroneous assumption that the Canada Health Act (CHA) and the relevant provincial legislation (Medicare Protection Act) provided the benefit claimed.

The claim preparation costs in claim No. 5000464 relate to all of Jordan's fourth and fifth F4 instalment claims, and not only its public health claim.

In the absence of such a procedure, some cases such as the present one are found to be inadmissible because the Committee is of the view that the claim of discrimination has not been made out.

Recommended award for claim No. 5000463 Claim No. 5000219 Public health Claim No. 5000219 comprises three claim units, with an asserted value of USD 19,861,782,707, for damage or risk of damage to public health resulting from Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

6.3 The Committee considers that the author has not substantiated, for purposes of admissibility, his claim that his conviction amounted to discrimination on the ground of his political opinion, in violation of article 26 of the Covenant.

The Palestinian individual claimant whose claim had been identified as potentially overlapping with the E4 claim has provided evidence to support the claim for loss of stock.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Jordan that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000464 is claim No. 5000353.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Syria that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000462 is claim No. 5000371.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Syria that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000467 is claim No. 5000372.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Syria that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000303 is claim No. 5000419.

This aspect of the original F3 claim was remitted to the Registrar of the Commission, allocated a new claim number, and set aside for future review (the current F3' claim ).

The Claim

The claim