Former Yugoslavia, 1998

International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia

Outstanding assessed contributions of the former Yugoslavia

Unpaid assessed contributions of the former Yugoslavia

Unpaid assessed contributions of the former Yugoslavia

Finally, domestic hostilities in the former Yugoslavia affected multiple treaties between Yugoslavia and several European countries.

International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, The Hague

Cooperation with the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia

Treatment of the unpaid assessed contributions of the former Yugoslavia

The residual 0.14 per cent of the scale (33.3 per cent of the original assessment rate for the former Yugoslavia) remained with the former Yugoslavia, to which the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (since renamed Serbia and Montenegro) succeeded on 27 April 1992.

The amounts outstanding as at 25 June 1991 were divided between Slovenia and the former Yugoslavia 16 per cent to Slovenia and the balance of 84 per cent to the former Yugoslavia.

j The former Yugoslavia acceded to the Convention on 27 November 1978.

q The former Yugoslavia acceded to the Convention on 26 February 1982.

As noted above, the former Yugoslavia ceased to exist on 1 November 2000.

c Succession the former Yugoslavia acceded to the Convention on 27 November 1978.

c Succession the former Yugoslavia acceded to the Convention on 26 February 1982.

There is no significant problem with the other States of the former Yugoslavia.

These relative shares reflect decisions already made by the Assembly with regard to the apportionment of the assessments of the former Yugoslavia and could also be applied to the unpaid assessed contributions of the former Yugoslavia.

Budget of the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia for the biennium 2008 2009

No further assessments have been issued for the former Yugoslavia since 1 November 2000.

The dissolution of the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia was a continuing process.

The dissolution of the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia was a continuing process.

Outstanding assessed contributions of the former Yugoslavia at 30 June 2005 (United States dollars)

As noted above, however, the previous Government of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (since renamed Serbia and Montenegro) repeatedly claimed to represent the former Yugoslavia.

Denmark remains a strong supporter of the Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and for Rwanda.

Ad litem Judge at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (The Hague, Netherlands)

Indeed, that Government claimed that the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia was the same person of international law, and so the same Member State, as the former Yugoslavia.

On that basis, Serbia and Montenegro may now be considered to be stopped from denying responsibility for the liabilities of the former Yugoslavia arising after the dissolution of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia but before the former Yugoslavia ceased to be a Member of the United Nations on 1 November 2000.

As successor States to the former Yugoslavia were admitted to the United Nations during the scale period 1992 1994, their initial rates of assessment were deducted from the rate of assessment initially assigned to the former Yugoslavia for 1992 1994.

Encourages the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia to continue its efforts to refer cases involving intermediate and lower ranking accused to competent national jurisdictions in the former Yugoslavia pursuant to rule 11 bis of its Rules of Procedure and Evidence.

The Tribunal began the process of transferring cases back to the States of the former Yugoslavia.

That decision necessarily and automatically terminated the membership of the former Yugoslavia in the United Nations.

I turn now to the Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, which continues to receive new indictees.

These credits included the share of the former Yugoslavia in budgetary surpluses and unencumbered balances arising for periods for which assessments were issued to the former Yugoslavia, as well as the assessments of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Slovenia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia for their respective years of admission.

Ms. Blokar (Slovenia), speaking on behalf of the successor States to the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, namely, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Serbia and Montenegro, and Slovenia, said that the question of the arrears of the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia remained unresolved.

The amounts outstanding for the former Yugoslavia as at 17 September 1991, that is, the balance as at 25 June 1991 plus any additional assessments and minus any payments and or credits arising in the meantime, were divided between the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and the former Yugoslavia a little over 8.9 per cent (that is, 7.5 divided by 84 times 100) to the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and the balance of a little over 91 per cent to the former Yugoslavia.

9. Encourages the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia to continue its efforts to refer cases involving intermediate and lower ranking accused to competent national jurisdictions in the former Yugoslavia pursuant to rule 11 bis of its Rules of Procedure and Evidence.

6. Notes with great concern the high vacancy rate in the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia

Outstanding assessed contributions of the former Yugoslavia at 27 April 1992 pre dissolution arrears (United States dollars)

Outstanding assessed contributions of the former Yugoslavia arising before and after 27 April 1992 (United States dollars)

I now give the floor to Judge Pocar, President of the International Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia.

The International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia is expected soon to transfer the first war crimes case.

Such entrants in recent years have largely come from Africa, the former Yugoslavia and the Middle East.

At that time, the former Yugoslavia had outstanding assessed contributions that had become due and payable both before and after the dissolution of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.

We require that the term Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia be used in the report instead of former Yugoslavia (paras. 5 10, 12 22, 25, 28 34 and 37).