The Higher Regional Court declared the award enforceable.

Data from Constitutional Court, Supreme Court, Higher Economic Court and Council of Justice.

The claimant then applied to the Higher Regional Court of Hamburg seeking to set aside the award according to  1059 ZPO, based on article 34 MAL.

Furthermore, the Court deemed that the original filing of the applications with the Higher Regional Court in Cologne was sufficient to prevent the one month time limit under 1040 (3) ZPO, based on article 16 (3) MAL, from expiring.

The Higher Regional Court found that the claimant was granted sufficient legal protection, because, irrespective of these opposing decisions, he was still able to pursue its rights before state Courts.

Moreover, the Regional Court handed down its judgement in open court.

Women constitute 21 on the Supreme Court and 36 on the Higher Economic Court (Table 5). Of 77 court chairpersons, only six are women (8 ).

In June 2000, he applied for a vacant post of District Court judge offering better promotion opportunities, a higher salary scale and higher pension benefits.

However, these were not the only considerations addressed by the Regional Trial Court and the Supreme Court.

In the case of kidnapping, he has legal representation and may appeal to a higher court.

The Regional Court confirmed this decision on 20 December 1995.

On 16 September 1998, the Regional Court refused her request.

The Utrecht Regional Court declared the author's counter claim inadmissible.

Regional offices had given a higher priority to evaluation within their biennial office management plans.

Although a person acquitted at first instance may be convicted on appeal by the higher court, this circumstance alone cannot impair the defendant's right to review of his conviction and sentence by a higher court, in the absence of a reservation by the State party.

On 19 October 1998, the Torun Provincial Court similarly rejected the author's appeal against the decision of the Regional Court.

On appeal, the Frankfurt Court of Appeal quashed that decision and referred the matter back to the Frankfurt Regional Court.

In the author's view, being tried by the highest court does not imply that that court cannot make mistakes that need to be reviewed by a higher tribunal.

(d) Expeditious consideration of the case by a specialized juvenile court, with the possibility of the judgment being contested by a higher court, once the child is convicted.

It is learned that this is the first time for president of the Provincial Higher People's Court and chief procurator of the Provincial People's Procuratorate to appear in court at the same time to perform their duties in accordance with law since the provincial judicial reform and even the establishment of the provincial higher court and the procuratorate.

On 29 April 2003, the Budapest Regional Court ordered a new trial.

The author claims that his right to have his conviction and sentence reviewed by a higher court was violated.

In addition, none of these three persons has been able to appeal against his conviction to a higher court.

Judges Van der Reep and Veger, who rendered judgement in the Court of Appeal case, also sit on the Utrecht Regional Court.

This decision was confirmed by the Plzen Regional Court on 25 March 1996.

6. Invites regional organizations to consider concluding cooperation agreements with the International Criminal Court

On 20 October 1998, the Regional Court granted her request and on 24 November 1998, the Regional Bar Association appointed counsel for the author.

Moreover, it transpires from the facts that the Trial Court conviction of the author was reviewed by the Court of Appeal, which is a higher tribunal within the meaning of article 14, paragraph 5.

On 4 September 2003, the Budapest Regional Court (Főrvărosi Bíróság) issued a final decision authorizing L.

Li Jing, president of the province's Higher People's Court, served as the presiding judge of this case, Wang Jin, chief procurator of the Provincial People's Procuratorate, appeared in court to support the process of indictment.

The Committee holds tout courte, see paragraph 7.1 supra, that Although a person acquitted at first instance may be convicted on appeal by the higher court, this circumstance alone cannot impair the defendant's right to review of his conviction and sentence by a yet higher court. This is new ground for the Committee, and its rule, widely applied, could disrupt the court systems of many civil law countries.

The majority of the Supreme Court held that the best reading of the words supported the conclusion that higher life forms are not patentable.

The Court will also need the assistance of other States in a position to assist the Court as well as that of international, regional and non governmental organizations.

On 26 June 1998, the Regional Court dismissed her appeal as she had missed the statutory deadline.

Its main focus will be on upgrading traditional processing enterprises in rural areas to supply higher value domestic, regional or international markets.

Previous position include Regional Director, Regional Directorate Director for Information Technology, Directorate of Tax Information Executive Secretary, National Tax Court and head of district, District Tax Office, Jakarta.

The court of the second instance, the Budapest Regional Court (Főrvărosi Bíróság), ordered the court of the first instance, the Pest Central District Court (Pesti Központi Kerületi Bíróság), to re try the case, namely because it had failed to decide on the merits of the request.

The judgement of 4 September 2003 of the Budapest Regional Court (Főrvărosi Bíróság) confirmed the District Court's decision.

2.2 On 10 February 1997, at the beginning of the court hearing, the author asked the trial judge to refer the case to another court, claiming that The Hague Regional Court could not be considered an independent and impartial tribunal.

After an adverse decision of the honorary board, the claimant (the association) applied to the Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt to have the board's interim decision on jurisdiction as well as its final decision on the merits set aside according to 1040 and 1059 ZPO, based on articles 16 and 34 MAL.

2.9 On 2 October 2000, the Frankfurt Court of Appeal dismissed the authors' immediate appeal, in the absence of a legal error in the impugned decision of the Frankfurt Regional Court.

The public prosecutor's office appealed but the case file was lost on its way to the Budapest Regional Court.

According to the decision, dated 26 June 1998, of the Regional Court, the statutory deadline was 26 February 1998.

It also states that the two judges in the Court of Appeal who are also deputy judges at the Utrecht Regional Court did not pronounce on the author's case at first instance.

He contends that the fact that the case was not referred to another Regional Court proved that the Hague Court of Appeal had an interest in passing judgement on the author's case.