She stated that there were many issues that overlap.

She stated that she had received cash ranging from 3 to 5 after each sexual encounter.

She once proudly stated that she was going to lose 5 kilos of fat in a single month.

Ms. Akşit (Turkey) said that she had not stated that headscarves were illegal in Turkey.

Indeed, she stated that the Dutch authorities don't follow an active policy of refoulement.

She stated that it would be useful if there was some sort of depository of information received.

She later stated, before the Aliens Appeal Board, having learned that her husband was residing in Sweden.

As regards the complainant's daughter, the medical certificate stated that she had fallen into a serious and threatening state and that she would need a long period of psychotherapeutic treatment.

She also stated that Mr. Abu Adas had asked her to apologize to another friend that he had made an appointment with on that date.

She stated that there was evidence that war crimes and atrocities might have occurred, although there was no finding of a policy of genocide.

In subsequent submissions to the Board her counsel stated that she was married to the complainant and offered to submit documentary evidence.

She stated that the Committee facilitated the interaction between the United Nations and civil society. It was a unique body with unique functions.

Additionally, she has stated that her husband had been in hiding since January or April 2000, due to the persecution of the Awami League, and that she had not been able to contact him since then.

Ms. Rasheed (Palestine) stated that she represented a people that continued to be subjected to one of the most brutal forms of colonialism in modern history.

She stated that the text sought to draw the international community's attention to the precarious situation of unaccompanied refugee children, a particularly vulnerable group.

In that regard, she stated that we look forward to the recommendations of the High level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change appointed by the Secretary General.

In relation to human rights impact assessments, Ms. O'Connor stated that she was not aware that instruments had been identified for undertaking such assessments so she was not sure how the working group could itself undertake an assessment.

Ms. Françoise Hampson stated that she had always been puzzled by those who said the functions of the Working Group were duplicated by other mechanisms.

She stated that keeping her son under such conditions amounted to an extrajudicial death sentence, and requested that those responsible for her son's death be brought to justice.

She further stated that approximately half of the funds available for allocation to travel grants were now used for the beneficiaries to attend the Permanent Forum.

The Director of INSTRAW stated that she had made extensive efforts to coordinate with other United Nations agencies in order to synergize policy and programmatic activities.

Also, she asked the delegation to clarify why the report stated (CEDAW C BEN 1 3, p. 70, sect.

She also submitted a medical certificate, issued by a psychologist on 22 May 2001, which stated that her mental condition had worsened, that she had insomnia, nausea, vomiting, cold sweats, difficulties in concentrating and talking, feebleness, and strong memories of the rape.

2.2 Before the Migration Board, the complainant stated that she became an active member of the Jatiya Party in Bangladesh in 1994, and that her husband had been active in the same party long before that.

With respect to legal provisions prohibiting discrimination, she noted that, when it had regained independence in 1990, Latvia had re established its 1922 Constitution, which was a framework document that stated only general principles.

Furthermore, Ms. Gascon's testimony during the trial began with a reminder that she had announced her intention of leaving him at the end of June 1991 and she stated, during cross examination, that it was on 12 August, when he first threatened her, that the author reproached her for this decision.

The Labour Inspectorate reported that there was no proof of an occupational accident, that there was no accident declaration and that the section supervisor stated that the author had never said that she had been struck in the eye.

V046A further stated that PK2 had wanted to have sexual intercourse with her on a second occasion, but she had refused as he did not have money or food for her.

For example, the report stated that even under the Christian form of marriage a wife could be disadvantaged, in that she could be completely disinherited by her husband, and the law provided no protection in that regard.

Latvia stated that the designated authorities were

The Philippines stated that its central authority was

Portugal stated that the designated central authority was

Austria stated that the acceptable language was German.

Belize stated that the acceptable language was English.

Botswana stated that English was the acceptable language.

Chile stated that the acceptable language was Spanish.

Croatia stated that the acceptable language was English.

Jamaica stated that the acceptable language was English.

Myanmar stated that the acceptable language was English.

Namibia stated that the acceptable language was English.

She was perplexed by an apparent contradiction in the report, which stated that there was no comprehensive national policy on women but yet provided details of the National Policy for the Advancement of Gambian Women.

Austria stated that its central authority was as follows

Canada stated that its central authority was as follows

Croatia stated that its central authority was as follows

Cyprus stated that its central authority was as follows