It argues that the complainant should have appealed against the royal decrees of 1999 that granted the pardons.

He argues however that the Charter only protects against State action, and not that of entities such as universities.

None argues against God s revelations except those who disbelieve. So do not be impressed by their activities in the land.

None argues against God s revelations except those who disbelieve. So do not be impressed by their activities in the land.

Shall he who argues contend with the Almighty? He who argues with God, let him answer it.

Shall he who argues contend with the Almighty? He who argues with God, let him answer it.

The source argues the following

12.13 The State party argues that its position in this regard should be seen against the background of the experience gained from the proceedings relating to the case of Hanan Attia.

No one argues we all agree there's a problem.

Accordingly, it argues that these expenses are not compensable.

The author further argues that domestic law does not afford him a remedy against the inaction of the authorities, and that he is being deprived of an opportunity to enforce his rights.

2.4 The complainant argues that he has exhausted domestic remedies.

It argues that the author has not exhausted domestic remedies.

However Ribot argues that privatization is not a form of decentralization.

The source, rebutting the response from the Government, argues the following

The source, rebutting the response from the Government, argues the following.

6.3 The author argues that he was an outspoken critic of the present Ugandan government during his time in Denmark and that he participated in conferences, where he protested against Uganda's treatment of political opponents.

Firstly, it argues that the petitioners mischaracterize the facts in important respects.

4.3 Thirdly, the State party argues that domestic remedies were not exhausted.

Iraq also argues that Iran has failed to substantiate the amount claimed.

In essence, the proposal argues for a drastic transformation of the existing CERF.

He also argues that the Public Service Act does not apply to universities.

He argues that a finding by these judges of the Supreme Court for the author in Royal's claim against him could have resulted in the termination of their membership on the Board and thus a loss of fees.

Colin argues this is not true, but accuses Paul of incompetently managing some properties.

The complainant's case proves it, the State party argues, as his curriculum vitae shows.

Thus, the State party argues, no such obligation may be inferred from article 9.

He argues that this delay was not justified by the complexity of the case.

Further, Iraq argues that the average treatment costs claimed by Kuwait are too high.

Iraq also argues that Saudi Arabia has overestimated the costs of the proposed preserves.

3.3 As to the exhaustion of domestic remedies, the petitioner argues that to take (unspecified) legal actions directly against Mr. Andreasen would not be effective given the rejection of the complaint by the Regional Public Prosecutor and the Ministry of Justice.

A proper assessment, Brock argues, depends on the composition and quality of total government spending.

It's not an issue if he argues with his wife, but he shouldn't hit her.

He argues that an example should be made of State officials found guilty of torture.

Alternatively, counsel argues that the steps taken to prevent and monitor the guarantees were insufficient.

He also argues that the procedures are ineffective as legal costs make them prohibitively expensive.

The White House argues the true cost of operating the helicopter is well below that rate.

Among the people is he who argues about God without knowledge, and follows every defiant devil.

Among the people is he who argues about God without knowledge, and follows every defiant devil.

4.3 The State party argues that there is no indication that the reservation itself is inadmissible.

It argues that there is recorded evidence of mismanagement of water resources in Jordan before 1991.

With regard to the claimed ecological losses, Iraq argues there is no irreparable or compensable loss.

Pakistan claimed that India, as an aggressor, could not lawfully suspend the agreements. Chinkin argues that

Turkey thus argues that the charge of genocide is designed to besmirch Turkey s honor and impede its progress towards EU accession. There are also understandable fears that diverging from the official line would trigger a flood of compensation claims, as occurred against Germany.

4.11 Lastly, the State party argues that the complainant may apply for permanent residence on humanitarian grounds.

8.7 The State party argues that the authors' claims under articles 26 and 27 are insufficiently substantiated.