The Panel has made specific adjustments to the two compensable claims.

Claims preparation costs A number of category D claimants have made claims for claims preparation costs incurred by them, either in amounts specified on the claim form or in general terms.

The Government's response to the claims made by the source is summarized below.

Claims that such information has been inadvertently or improperly made public are a possibility.

These claims were reported in the Report and recommendations made by the Panel of Commissioners concerning the thirtieth instalment of E4' claims (S AC.26 2005 4) and the Fourth special report and recommendations made by the merged E4' Panel of Commissioners concerning overlapping claims (S AC.26 2005 5).

Having received, in accordance with article 37 of the Provisional Rules for Claims Procedure ( the Rules ), the report and recommendations made by the D1 panel of Commissioners concerning the late filed category A and category C claims programme, covering 3,783 claims,

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS MADE BY THE PANEL OF COMMISSIONERS CONCERNING THE THIRTIETH INSTALMENT OF E4 CLAIMS

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS MADE BY THE D2 PANEL OF COMMISSIONERS CONCERNING PALESTINIAN INDIVIDUAL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES

The Panel has made recommendations with respect to the remaining personal losses asserted in these claims.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS MADE BY THE PANEL OF COMMISSIONERS CONCERNING THE FIFTH INSTALMENT OF F4 CLAIMS

With regard to the claims made for pain and suffering for non fatal injuries, the Claimants state that these are distinct from the government claims for reduced quality of life.

Having received, in accordance with article 37 of the Provisional Rules for Claims Procedure ( the Rules ), the second report and recommendations made by the D1 panel of Commissioners concerning the late filed category A and category C claims programme, covering 339 claims,

The background to these groups of claims is set out in the Report and recommendations made by the Panel of Commissioners concerning the first instalment of Palestinian late claims' for damages up to USD 100,000 (category C' claims) (S AC.26 2003 26).

Agreement from national and private entities that any claims be made in accordance with the Kyoto Protocol mechanisms and made to the Executive Secretary

SECOND FOURTH SPECIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS MADE BY THE MERGED E4 PANEL OF COMMISSIONERS CONCERNING OVERLAPPING CLAIMS

Consequently, as a result of the data entry errors, incorrect recommendations were made in respect of these claims.

Ensure that claims of racial discrimination brought by non citizens are investigated thoroughly and that claims made against officials, notably those concerning discriminatory or racist behaviour, are subject to independent and effective scrutiny

See the Report and recommendations made by the D2' Panel of Commissioners concerning part two of the fourteenth instalment of individual claims for damages above USD 100,000 (category D' claims) (S AC.26 2003 7), paragraphs 65 67, and the Report and recommendations made by the D1' Panel of Commissioners concerning part two of the fifteenth instalment of individual claims for damages above USD 100,000 (category D' claims) (S AC.26 2003 8), paragraphs 88 91.

Second instalment category A claims corrections Third instalment category A claims corrections Fourth instalment category A claims corrections Fifth instalment category A claims corrections Sixth instalment category A claims corrections First instalment category C claims corrections Fourth instalment category C claims corrections

The E4 Panel reviewed and made recommendations for awards of compensation for the second, sixth, and eighteentheighth and twentieth instalments of E4 claims, and the E4A Panel reviewed and made recommendations for awards of compensation for the tenth and and twenty second sixteenth instalments of E4 claims.

See Report and recommendations made by the Panel of Commissioners concerning the sixth instalment of individual claims for damages above USD 100,000 (category D' claims) (S AC.26 2000 24) (the Sixth Instalment Report ).

Decides that, beginning with the next round of payment, the payment of claims will be made in two phases

The background to this group of claims is set out in the Report and recommendations made by the Panel of Commissioners concerning the first instalment of Palestinian late claims' for damages up to USD 100,000 (category C' claims) (S AC.26 2003 26) (the First Palestinian C' Report ).

The Panel reviewed the potentially overlapping claims in the fourthsecond group of overlapping claims as and when the information provided by the claimants permitted an initial determination to be made on the existence of overlap.

See paragraphs 207 213 of the Report and recommendations made by the Panel of Commissioners concerning the sixth instalment of individual claims for damages above USD 100,000 (category D' claims) (S AC.26 2000 24).

See paragraphs 343 346 of the Report and recommendations made the Panel of Commissioners concerning the seventh instalment of individual claims for damages up to US 100,000 (category C' claims) (S AC.26 1999 11).

See Report and recommendations made by the Panel of Commissioners concerning part one of the first instalment of individual claims for damages above US 100,000 (Category D' claims) (S AC.26 1998 1), paragraph 223.

See Report and recommendations made by the Panel of Commissioners concerning the seventh instalment of individual claims for damages up to US 100,000 (category C' claims) (S AC.26 1999 11) (the Seventh C' Report ).

Subsequent groups of overlapping claims were identified and reviewed in the Second special report and recommendations made by the E4' and E4A' Panels of Commissioners concerning overlapping claims (S AC.26 2003 24) (the Second Special Overlap Report ) and the Third special report and recommendations made by the merged E4' Panel of Commissioners concerning overlapping claims (S AC.26 2004 13) (the Third Special Overlap Report ).

Furthermore, the State party has explicitly confirmed that the claims made in the communication were already assessed by domestic courts.

In this case, silence could have provided a basis for establishing acquiescence to the claims made by these two countries.

As with earlier instalments of category D claims, the Panel has reviewed the claims in this instalment in accordance with article 35 of the Rules, and made its recommendations by assessing documentary and other appropriate evidence.

See Report and recommendations made by the Panel of Commissioners concerning part one of the second instalment of individual claims for damages above US 100,000 (category D' claims) (S AC.26 1998 11), paragraphs 77 115.

See Report and recommendations made by the Panel of Commissioners concerning part one of the first instalment of individual claims for damages above US 100,000 (category D' claims) (S AC.26 1998 1), paragraphs 61 63.

The fourthsecond group of overlapping claims initially consisted of E4 claims related to 39seven category C claims and 24 category C and D claims.

Information that the COP MOP has mandated be kept confidential will be susceptible to claims that it was improperly made public.

Noting also that following the last round of payment made on 27 October 2005, there remain 85 claims with payments outstanding,

The application of decision 123 to a group of claims in the first seven instalments of E4 claims that had been identified as potentially overlapping with claims submitted by individuals in category C and or D is described in the Special report and recommendations made by the E4' and E4A' Panels of Commissioners concerning overlapping claims (S AC.26 2002 28) (the Special Overlap Report ).

The average number of loss types is 3.14 for the claims in this instalment, compared with 2.01 for all claims in the regular category D claims programme, 1.93 for Jordanian claims and 1.71 for Kuwaiti claims.

See the Report and recommendations made by the Panel of Commissioners regarding the second instalment of E4' claims (S AC.26 2000 17), paragraphs 100 101, and the Report and recommendations made by the Panel of Commissioners regarding the fifth instalment of E2' claims (S AC.26 1999 17), paragraphs 67 72.

Accordingly, all claims made in the present communication have already been assessed by the domestic courts, including the Supreme Court of Norway.

Concerning the issue of duplicate claims, the secretariat indicated that it was aware of the risk of duplicate claims from the outset of claims processing and took steps to identify and eliminate such claims during the course of claims processing.

Report and recommendations made by the Panel of Commissioners concerning the first instalment of A' claims , S AC.26 1994 2, pages 24 26, 28 29 and Report and recommendations made by the Panel of Commissioners concerning the first instalment of F2' claims , S AC.26 1999 23 ( first F2' report ), paragraphs 30 31.

a The Report and recommendations made by the Panel of Commissioners concerning the eighteenth instalment of E4' claims (S AC.26 2000 22).

Consequently, a correction resulting in a deduction in the total amount of USD 26,908.64 should be made in respect of these two claims.