Clean coal technologies were at least 25 percent more efficient than traditional coal fired power plants.

The large coal fired power station we're building at King's North, and of course the exciting news that only today, only this week, Britain's only manufacturer of wind turbines has been forced to close.

From 1996 to 2000, China also closed down many coal fired power plants that were producing less than 50 MW of power.

Put differently, if the world continues to build coal fired power plants at the current rate, those plants will still be around in 2050, regardless of what other technologies become viable in the meantime. Solar power cannot stop those coal fired plants from being built today.

It is little wonder, then, that US Energy Secretary Steven Chu, who two years ago described the expansion of coal fired power plants as his worst nightmare, now calls coal a great natural resource.

Denmark, which houses some of the most efficient coal fired power plants in the world, equally relies on coal for half of its electricity production. The same is true for Germany, which is home to some of the most efficient pulverized coal combustion units in Europe.

But this approach would still consume too much of the CO2 budget. Even the most modern and advanced conventional coal fired power plants emit over 15 times more CO2 per unit of electricity than renewable energy systems, and more than twice the amount of efficient gas fired power stations.

But one day of coal adds up to one hell of a lot of carbon dioxide in a normal one gigawatt coal fired plant.

Moreover, most economic models do not account for the externalities related to coal and carbon pollution. For example, a recent report by Trucost estimates that coal fired power generation worldwide may be responsible for around 1 trillion of damage due to climate change and air pollution.

Thank you power station.

The broader task is to integrate these vehicles into a more efficient and cleaner power grid for example, by replacing aging coal fired power plants with hydroelectric power. Moreover, local and national governments should work with the automobile industry to integrate zero emission vehicles into national transport infrastructure.

Second, the world s two largest greenhouse gas emitters, the United States and China, are now more committed to action than they were five years ago. US President Barack Obama has announced a far reaching plan that authorizes the Environment Protection Agency to take dramatic measures in the next few months to limit power station emissions, virtually ending coal fired electricity generation altogether.

This is why the OECD Secretary General has suggested that it is time for a moratorium on the construction of conventional coal fired power plants. Governments have far more cost effective electricity generation technologies at their disposal.

China removed and cleaned up the old power station at Great Wall Station.

Where this will lead the world can be seen even today China already has the world s most ambitious scheme for expanding nuclear energy, and every year it builds coal fired power plants whose electricity output is roughly equivalent to the capacity of the entire British power grid!

These efforts dwarf expected US initiatives. Nevertheless, in the near future, China also will build 500,000 MW of coal fired power plants (more than the entire existing US stock), at great risk to the global atmosphere and environment.

President Barack Obama s administration is trying to stop the construction of new coal fired power plants, unless they are equipped with CCS technology. China, for its part, has realized that its heavy dependence on coal is causing such devastating pollution and smog that it is leading to massive loss of life, with life expectancy down as much as five years in regions with heavy coal consumption.

Much of the future increases in coal fired electricity generation will come from strategically important developing countries like China and India. In 2006 alone, China added about 93,000 megawatts of coal fired electricity generating capacity, and this trend is expected to continue as the country tries to meet its huge energy needs.

The rich world gets just 1.2 of its energy from hugely expensive solar and wind technologies, and we would never accept having power only when the wind was blowing. Over the next two years, Germany will build ten new coal fired power plants to keep the lights on.

And, as a recent study shows, because China s coal fired power plants are so dirty, electric cars make the local air worse. In Shanghai, air pollution from an additional million gasoline powered cars would kill an estimated nine people each year.

Obama also mentioned that he had raised fuel economy standards for cars in the US, and had invested in renewable energy sources, like solar and wind power. But, when Romney talked about increasing coal production, Obama neglected to point out that carbon dioxide from coal fired electricity generation is already a major contributor to climate change that we still lack the technology to produce clean coal and that increasing the use of coal will impose huge burdens on people worldwide.

A project that we've been working on very recently is to design a new biomass power station so a power station that uses organic waste material.

Gore and Hansen want a moratorium on coal fired power plants, but neglect the fact that the hundreds of new power plants that will be opened in China and India in the coming years could lift a billion people out of poverty. Negating this outcome through a moratorium is clearly no unmitigated good.

Consider Pakistan and South Africa, where a dearth of generating capacity means recurrent blackouts that wreak havoc on businesses and cost jobs. Yet the funding of new coal fired power plants in both countries has been widely opposed by well meaning Westerners and governments.

Some Parties are proposing the introduction of efficient fuel for boilers in industry, efficient coal fired boilers, efficient electrical motors, and efficient lighting in industrial buildings.

But recently, any annual report of a power company doesn't have a power station on it.

The world needs to stop building new coal fired power plants (except those that implement CCS) and to shift to low carbon electricity. It needs to phase out the internal combustion engine for almost all new passenger vehicles by around 2030, shifting to vehicles powered by electricity.

Indeed, the joint air monitoring network provides a foundation for the region to develop a sophisticated regional air management program. Furthermore, new coal fired power plants may no longer be allowed on either side of the border, necessitating greater use of natural gas and renewable energy sources.

And coal burning furnaces are going in there for hydroelectric power literally weekly.

Article 51 Railway station and port authorities engaged in coal transportation and other transport enterprises may not take advantage of the transportation capacity in their hands to take part in coal marketing business and seek improper interests.

Nonetheless, many who live in rich countries confidently declare that this trade off is not in the interest of the poor. The United States, the United Kingdom, and other European countries announced this year that they will not support international finance for coal fired power plants in developing countries.

Have a moratorium we shouldn't have any new coal fired generating plants that aren't able to capture and store CO2, which means we have to quickly build these renewable sources.

As the South African finance minister, Pravin Gordhan, explained, to sustain the growth rates we need to create jobs, we have no choice but to build new generating capacity relying on what, for now, remains our most abundant and affordable energy source coal. The US government even acknowledged that, without a coal fired power plant, South Africa s economic recovery will suffer, adversely impacting electrification, job creation, and social indicators.

And there are 2,000 new homes being built next to this power station.

The finished project is meant to be more than just a power station.

First, increased reliance on fossil fuels runs contrary to the 1997 Kyoto Protocol s targets for reducing carbon emissions, as well as to the EU s own climate change objectives. Moreover, fossil fuel costs fluctuate wildly with oil prices, and the centralized nature of nuclear and coal fired power stations creates distribution problems.

A reliable infrastructure has enabled us to commence work on another nuclear power station, the Chashma Nuclear Power Plant II.

Imagine you could back up a single power station with a single superconducting cable.

There is also the challenge inherent in wind generated electricity ensuring that the city can continue to run when the wind is not blowing. To address this problem, Copenhagen has had to devise an electricity generation strategy that enables it sometimes to run on coal fired power when necessary, without creating net emissions.

The power generated would meet the demand of nearly 750,000 households, and save 250,000 tonnes of coal.

Five weeks ago, a group of activists from the business community gathered together to stop a Texas utility from building nine coal fired electrical plants that would have contributed to destroying the environment.

Coal mining enterprises and coal trading enterprises may not adulterate coal and sell inferior coal as quality coal.

The World Resources Institute estimates that there are close to 1,200 proposed coal fired power projects around the world, with a total installed capacity of more than 1,400 gigawatts. If built, the world would commit a large share of the remaining carbon budget to high carbon infrastructure with a lifespan of 40 50 years.

In March, Al Gore s science adviser and prominent climate researcher, Jim Hansen, proclaimed that when it comes to dealing with global warming, the democratic process isn t working. Although science has demonstrated that CO2 from fossil fuels is heating the planet, politicians are unwilling to follow his advice and stop building coal fired power plants.

Article 61 Without consent of coal mining enterprises, no units or individuals may occupy the railways, roads, navigation channels, wharves, power lines and water supply pipes specially used by coal mining enterprises.