3.1 The complainant claims that he has exhausted all available criminal domestic remedies by having filed a complaint with the Public Prosecutor's Office.

Since no formal criminal proceedings followed as a result of his complaint with the Public Prosecutor, the first avenue remained closed to him.

3.8 As to the exhaustion of domestic remedies, the author argues, with respect to the pending civil complaint, that a victim is only required to pursue one remedy to exhaustion (that is, the criminal complaint), even if other remedies are available.

According to article 144 of the Criminal Code, the court has a right to invite the person held in custody to participate in the complaint investigation.

As to the portion of the complaint concerning the petitioner's inability to appeal the decision concerning Mr. Andreasen, the State party refers to its submissions on admissibility concerning the available possibilities of a constitutional complaint and a private prosecution under section 267 of the Criminal Code.

6.3 The Committee notes the authors' complaint that Spanish criminal procedure legislation allows the prosecutor the option of requesting additional investigation proceedings after the investigation phase has concluded.

2.6 In the meantime, on 7 April 1998, the author had filed a criminal complaint with the Thessaloniki Misdemeanours Prosecutor against the four officers involved in Mr. Celal's shooting.

With respect to the exhaustion of domestic remedies, the Committee took note of the information provided by the complainant about the criminal complaint which he filed with the public prosecutor.

With respect to the exhaustion of domestic remedies, the Committee took note of the information provided by the complainant about the criminal complaint that he filed with the Public Prosecutor.

Complaint No.

The complaint

The complaint

The complaint

The complaint

Pursuant to domestic law, the complainant had the possibility of seeking compensation by way of two different procedures (i) criminal proceedings, under article 103 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which should have been instituted on the basis of his criminal complaint or (ii) in a civil action for damages under articles 154 and 200 of the Law on Obligations.

Since the Public Prosecutor's Office has failed formally to dismiss the complainant's criminal complaint, he cannot personally take over the prosecution of the case in the capacity of a private prosecutor .

The author states that the high court's decision led her to lodge a criminal complaint against the lower court judge, in view of the corporate spirit which prevailed among the judges.

At the time the complainant submitted his case to the Committee, i.e. more than 23 months after the submission of the criminal complaint, no response had been received from the Public Prosecutor.

2.4 The complaint was immediately registered by the Public Prosecutor's Office. But only on 17 September 1999 (more than 3½ years after the incident and 34 months since the complainant had filed the criminal complaint) did the Public Prosecutor's Office request the investigating judge of the Novi Sad Municipal Court to undertake preliminary investigatory actions .

7.5 Concerning the author's complaint of his difficulties in finding a job because of his criminal record, the Committee considers that the author has not exhausted domestic remedies with respect to this allegation of discrimination.

Complaint by Cuba (S 10993).

2.3 On 31 January 2000, the complainant, through counsel, filed a criminal complaint with the Kragujevac Municipal Public Prosecutor's Office alleging that he had been the victim of the crimes of slight bodily harm and civil injury, as provided for under articles 54 (2) and 66 of the Serbian Criminal Code, respectively.

2.8 By submission of 3 February 2004, the authors informed that on 13 July 2003 they had filed a complaint in the International Criminal Court against Argentina for an alleged crime against humanity committed against them.

In particular, he declined to put to the Constitutional Court any complaint that Spain's law of criminal procedure is deficient insofar as it fails to grant a full appeal from convictions rendered in a second instance court.

In the complaint he alleged that an unidentified police officer had committed the crime of extracting a statement by force in violation of 65 of the Serbian Criminal Code (SCC). According to the complainant, he had been arrested several times prior to the incident in question and had been interrogated about several unrelated criminal offences.

There is no cause for complaint.

Date of complaint 8 February 2002

Date of complaint 19 November 2002

Date of complaint 28 November 2002

Date of complaint 25 June 2003

Date of complaint 28 February 2000

(c) The object of the complaint

Two treaties have no complaint procedures, and far fewer States have acceded to existing complaint procedures than to the treaties themselves.

On 20 January 1998, the President of the Moscow City Court explained that the author's complaint was groundless, because the sanction under article 228 of the new Criminal Code for the possession of 10 grams of marijuana without intention to sell was in fact heavier than the sanction under article 224 of the former Criminal Code.

Having concluded its consideration of complaint No.

Having concluded its consideration of complaint No.

Date of the complaint 20 December 2001

Date of the complaint 8 November 2002

Date of the complaint 12 December 2002

Date of the complaint 16 January 2003

The complaint should therefore be found inadmissible.

Date of the complaint 7 June 2002

(a) That the complaint is inadmissible and

Date of the complaint 16 September 2002

(a) That the complaint is inadmissible and