The embargo policy is also harmful to citizens of the United States and third countries.

The adverse effects of the embargo on Cuban biotechnology have also been indirectly harmful to health in developing countries.

Arms embargo

Arms embargo

Arms embargo

Arms embargo

Arms embargo

Arms embargo

EMBARGO 6 SEPTEMBER 2004

Status of the embargo

Monitoring the arms embargo

Territory of the embargo

Countries also have to exert some restraint when they are exporting to conflict areas, even when an arms embargo has not yet been imposed.

Scope of the arms embargo

Monitoring of the arms embargo

C. Improving the arms embargo

Scope of the arms embargo

Examples of arms embargo violations

E. Arms embargo ban implemented?

C. Arms embargo ban implemented?

The OPEC Oil Embargo at 40

Recommendations an integrated arms embargo approach

6380 Prohibition for political reasons (embargo)

Unfortunately, that is hampered by the embargo imposed on Armenia, as well as by the unwillingness of some countries in our region to engage in such cooperation.

Reported violations of arms embargo in Somalia

The embargo has a marked extraterritorial component.

Resolution 1596 (2005) extended the embargo to the entire Democratic Republic of the Congo, and helped to clarify the exemptions to the embargo.

Known arms embargo violations during the mandate period

The integrated arms embargo concept is detailed below.

Monitoring Team activities related to the arms embargo

(d) Monitor the implementation of the arms embargo.

Until Section 211 was approved, the intellectual property rights of owners, both natural and juridical persons, in both countries continued to be recognized on a mutual basis, despite the embargo.

Analysis of trends and patterns of arms embargo violations

Necessity of ending the economic, commercial and financial embargo

Growing opposition to the embargo within the United States

Overview of the arms embargo violations during the mandate period

Analysis of the trends and patterns of arms embargo violations

The embargo against Cuba is an act of economic war.

The embargo has caused enormous suffering for the Cuban people.

The embargo has also affected vector vigilance and control activities.

The new concept is best described as an integrated arms embargo.

The Government of Cuba has a sovereign right to denounce the harm that the embargo causes to its people, to the people of the United States, to third countries and to international law.

The falsity of the United States Government's cynical insistence on presenting its embargo policy against Cuba as an exclusively bilateral matter has been clearly demonstrated by its impact on numerous States, and citizens and companies from third countries, resulting from the extraterritorial provisions of the embargo, which not even international organizations of the United Nations system have been able to avoid.

In October 2004, the customs expert of the Monitoring Group addressed a meeting of regional customs intelligence national contact persons for East and Southern African countries, drawing attention to the United Nations arms embargo.

This resolve has made it possible, despite the embargo, to build a society that is increasingly just, equitable and educated, in solidarity with other peoples from countries around the world, including the United States.