FRB SC is competent to review the legality of his detention under the Foreigners Act 1946.

Does your State have a mechanism to review the legality of new weapons, methods of warfare and military doctrine?

(v) Does your State have a mechanism to review the legality of new weapons, methods of warfare and military doctrine?

On 30 January 2003, the fourth criminal court of the Bogotá special circuit dismissed the application for a review of the legality of Mr. Martínez Ramírez' detention.

Russia s Lawless Legality

The question of legality will be examined below.

Draft article 10 Legality of the conduct of the parties

That represents a true deviation from the logic of international legality.

On 18 November 2002, Mr. Castellanos submitted a petition calling for a review of the legality of the custodial measure to the criminal court of the Bogotá specialized circuit and submitted an appeal against the decision to close the investigation.

The topic was distinct from that of the legality of the use of force.

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, supra note 84, at para.

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, supra note 84, at para.

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, supra note 84, at para.

In the last sentence, after international legitimacy , insert and legality .

At the 2000 NPT Review Conference, Malaysia and Costa Rica submitted a Working paper on Follow Up to the International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (NPT CONF.2000 MC.I SB.I WP.4).

(iv) The Act on the Public Prosecution Office, which provides that the Prosecutor has a duty to oversee compliance by public administration bodies with laws and regulations, and to review the legality of binding regulations issued by public administration bodies.

Legality of arms trading entails the conduct of transfers in an even more responsible manner.

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, ICJ Reports, 1996, pp. 241 and 242.

Bearing in mind the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice of 8 July 1996 on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons,Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1996, p. 226.

Recalling the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, issued on 8 July 1996,Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1996, p. 226.

1.1. build on the Working paper submitted by Malaysia and Costa Rica to the 2000 NPT Review Conference Follow Up to the International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (NPT CONF.2000 MC.I SB.I WP.4)

Noting the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice, on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, issued at The Hague on 8 July 1996,Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1996, p. 226.

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, written submission of France, p. 38 (20 June 1995).

The restoration of legality must be pursued in that country with due respect for the rule of law.

See the statement by the United Kingdom on Legality of the threat or the use of nuclear weapons.

Acceptable explanations and clarifications for the person submitting the report can be oral and written evidence presented by the customer that identify the legality of the concluded or proposed transaction or legality of origin of the asset subject to transaction or its factual belonging.

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1996, p. 226, at p. 240.

Bearing in mind the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice of 8 July 1996 on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons,A 51 218, annex see also Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1996, p. 226.

Bearing in mind the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice of 8 July 1996 on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons,A 51 218, annex see also Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1996, p. 226.

Bearing in mind the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice of 8 July 1996 on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons,A 51 218, annex see also Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1996, p. 226.

Bearing in mind the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice of 8 July 1996 on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons,A 51 218, annex see also Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1996, p. 226.

Bearing in mind the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice of 8 July 1996 on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons,A 51 218, annex see also Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1996, p. 226.

At the same time, men still hold leadership positions in institutions involved in the review of constitutionality and legality, such as the Chancellor of Justice, the Auditor General, the Chief Public Prosecutor and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, the State Secretary, the Director of the State Chancellery, etc.

Recalling the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, issued on 8 July 1996,A 51 218, annex see also Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports, 1996, p. 226.

Recalling the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, issued on 8 July 1996,A 51 218, annex see also Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1996, p. 226.

Recalling the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, issued on 8 July 1996,A 51 218, annex see also Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports, 1996, p. 226.

Recalling the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, issued on 8 July 1996,A 51 218, annex see also Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports, 1996, p. 226.

Recalling the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, issued on 8 July 1996,A 51 218, annex see also Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1996, p. 226.

Recalling the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, issued on 8 July 1996,A 51 218, annex see also Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1996, p. 226.

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, written submission of the United States, p. 43 (20 June 1995).

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, written submission of the Russian Federation, p. 9 (19 June 1995).

As a result, legality has emerged as the main source of political legitimacy in the modern world. Consequently, those who are more interested in arbitrary authority than legality are using the language of law to legitimize their actions and weakening the rule of law in the process.

Committing to the sublime human values enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations and the rules of international legality,

The lawyers acting on behalf of Mr. El Derini filed a lawsuit challenging the legality of the third detention order.

Noting the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, issued at The Hague on 8 July 1996,A 51 218, annex see also Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1996, p. 226.