2.4 In a ruling dated 17 March 1995, Murcia employment tribunal No. 3 rejected the author's claim.

However, the Committee notes that the communication raises issues with regard to the claim relating to the alleged violation of the right to a fair hearing by an impartial tribunal established by law and will examine that part of the claim under the same article.

With regard to paragraph (4), support was expressed for the Commission's view that it was for the competent international tribunal to determine the admissibility of a claim of exception to the local remedies rule.

B. United Nations Dispute Tribunal and United Nations Appeals Tribunal

The claim preparers were often listed as the contact persons in the claim files and some claim files included attestations from the claim preparers opining on the merits of the claim.

The sixth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The fifth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The third claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

At the request of Saudi Arabia, the secretariat incorporated that claim in the current claim (Claim No. 5000463).

(b) There is a reasonable possibility that the requesting party will succeed on the merits of the claim, provided that any determination on this possibility shall not affect the discretion of the arbitral tribunal in making any subsequent determination.

THE E2 CLAIM Background to the E2 claim The E2 claim in this instalment was initially filed in category D .

The first claim unit is for reduction in crop yields and the second claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

Second claim unit Claim preparation costs Saudi Arabia seeks compensation in the amount of USD 5,874 for claim preparation costs.

(c) Jurisdiction of the United Nations Dispute Tribunal and the United Nations Appeals Tribunal

Khmer Rouge tribunal

Khmer Rouge Tribunal

Khmer Rouge Tribunal

The Services Tribunal.

This claim was originally part of category F3 claim No. 5000194.

The deferred part of claim No. 5000458 is reviewed as part of the second claim unit (terrestrial resources) of this claim.

At its seventeenth session, the Tribunal adopted editorial corrections to the Rules of the Tribunal.

Third claim unit Claim preparation costs Jordan seeks compensation in the amount of USD 1,700,000 for claim preparation costs for its fourth and fifth F4 instalment claims, including its public health claim.

The Panel considers that this claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The Panel considers that this is a claim for claim preparation costs.

The Claim

The claim

Overlapping claim

2.2 On 29 December 1995 the employment tribunal rejected the claim, maintaining that, in the light of previous decisions, including a decision issued by the Supreme Court on 5 June 1982, hours spent on call could not be considered to constitute overtime.

(c) An arbitral tribunal

The Iraqi Special Tribunal

Presented by the Tribunal

Meetings of the Tribunal

Liability of the Tribunal

Prepared by the Tribunal

The Tribunal recommends that

Refugee Review Tribunal cases

The claim comprises four claim units with an asserted value of USD 161,000,000.

A Tribunal is established by the present Statute to be known as the United Nations Administrative Tribunal.

The President of the Tribunal made a statement on the work of the Tribunal on that occasion.

Recommended award for claim No. 5000301 Claim No. 5000288 Other resources Claim No. 5000288 comprises six claim units, with a total asserted value of USD 7,916,024,475, for losses resulting from Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

The deferred part of claim No. 5000379 has been included in claim No. 5000301.

To date, the Tribunal has concluded agreements with six countries on enforcement of the sentences of the Tribunal.

The claim preparation costs in claim No. 5000464 relate to all of Jordan's fourth and fifth F4 instalment claims, and not only its public health claim.

(d) A special arbitral tribunal.

Judicial work of the Tribunal