We now wield the paintbrush.

And Women Need to Wield It.

Our preference is to limit the use of veto and to promote a veto free culture.

Former leaders of Ituri armed groups continue to wield influence

They should have a right of veto.

Well, inspired by the sentences, I decided to wield the paintbrush.

Instead, a veto free culture should be promoted.

(a) Restraint on the use of the veto

The Hamas Veto

It was also suggested that if a veto is used, an explanation of the reasons for the veto should be given to the Assembly.

Limiting the Security Council Veto

There should be no extension of the right of veto, and the use of the veto should be limited.

The Governor has the power to veto a budget bill, following which the bill is returned to the Legislature, which can either override the Governor's veto by a special majority or reconsider the bill.

A small minority cannot be allowed to veto the establishment of the Council.

Until the final objective of the elimination of the veto is achieved, as a first step it is necessary to limit the veto to actions taken under Chapter VII of the Charter.

Other delegations stated that the elimination of the veto was not a realistic proposition.

The question of the use of the veto

(f) The question of the use of the veto.

In our view, the veto can rarely be justified.

Collective action to prevent and respond to genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes must, therefore, not be made impossible by a veto or threat of veto by one of the permanent members of the Council.

We ask for at least two permanent members with a veto and five non permanent seats.

And like any new technology, it's really in humanity's hands to wield it for the betterment of mankind, or not.

As a matter of principle, and in keeping with its historical position of rejecting the veto, Chile makes a specific reservation with regard to the granting of the right of veto to the new permanent members, whether immediately or subject to a suspension or moratorium.

But our critics say that the AU is not really committed to the veto at all that it does not really want the veto, but something entirely different.

My third point relates to the use of the veto.

The third message is the claim to the veto power.

Let me briefly deal with the matter of the veto.

We have often reaffirmed that the veto should be eliminated.

What will it mean to wield power in the global information age of the twenty first century? Which resources will produce power?

We have also consistently advocated limiting the use of the veto.

Moreover, we must do away with the right of the veto.

Should the veto be extended to new permanent members or eliminated?

The veto has never allowed the consensus or majority sovereign expression of the Security Council it has served only as a way in which to block the popular will so as to protect the interests of the Power exercising the veto.

Forty years later, this group, more than most, are well aware of the destructive power that our species can wield over our environment.

In fact, veto power should be given only to the General Assembly, to be exercised by a majority vote.

The proposed language concerning the veto power has already found broad acceptance.

The use of the veto power should be limited and eventually eliminated.

First, we have since 1945 opposed any extension of the veto right.

Our support is without prejudice to our historical position on the veto.

Some participants urged ending permanent membership and restricting or ending the veto.

Lastly, what credibility would such a Council have, and what principles of equality and democracy could it invoke, if the Security Council were to be a three tiered body with, as it were, three groupings permanent members with the veto, permanent members without the veto and non permanent members?

May it not be that if you were to wield authority you would cause corruption in the land and ill treat your blood relations?

May it not be that if you were to wield authority you would cause corruption in the land and ill treat your blood relations?

Neither the concept of permanent membership nor the veto has been a useful tool for ensuring international peace and security.

In line with the need for effective decision making, it is our preference to limit the use of the veto in general, and we certainly oppose extension of the veto to new permanent members.