Exclusions

Other exclusions

Security Exclusions

Article 2. Exclusions

Article 2 Exclusions

Exclusions from scope

Article 4. Exclusions

Exclusions and other limitations

Article 2. Exclusions (continued)

Article 2. Exclusions (continued)

Scope of the cover and exclusions

Article 9. Specific exclusions and inclusions

Omissions and exclusions of some sources do affect the comparability.

No exclusions with regard to supervision are envisaged for this sector.

Draft article 18, paragraph 2, provided for exclusions from the scope of application of the draft convention, whereas draft article 9, paragraph 6, referred to exclusions agreed between the parties.

The reservation to article 11 was based on the premise that the article did not allow for exclusions he did not agree that article 11, paragraph 1 did not permit exclusions.

There was no reason for the reservation, in his view, unless exclusions were excessive.

States that had concerns regarding those matters could make exclusions under draft article 18.

It is prohibited to use a non detectable MOTAPM, subject to the exclusions specified below.

The Commission was therefore urged not to expand the scope for exclusions under paragraph (2).

Mr. Chong (Singapore) said he agreed with the representative of the United States that the Working Group, at its forty fourth session, had decided against a large number of global exclusions, preferring to leave States free to make their own exclusions.

Mr. Madrid Parra (Spain) said that in order to keep the scope of application of the draft convention as broad as possible only minimal exclusions were established under draft article 2, while States could make additional exclusions under draft article 18.

So, it's these exclusions to the golden rule that amount to a lot of the world's trouble.

Ireland's Equality Act had fewer exclusions in the 2004 revision than it had had in earlier legislation.

In his view, exclusions should not be permitted where consensus had been reached on a draft article.

Paragraph 3 (a) of the guidelines (distinctions, exclusions, restrictions or preferences between persons or groups of persons)

Also, preference has in one reply been expressed for the wider exclusions permitted under the Hague Visby Rules.

Mr. Mazzoni (Italy) said that it should be made clear that States were entitled to make exclusions in that regard.

Thus, in addition to exclusions in article 2, States would be able to exclude other matters under articles 18 and 19.

8. As stated in the initial report, there are no distinctions or exclusions on grounds of sex in the Argentine Republic.

As stated earlier, the Political Constitution and the LFT prohibit discrimination on any grounds whatsoever consequently there are in principle no exclusions.

With a view to discouraging wide resort to public policy exceptions, exclusions under paragraph (2) would best be left to national law.

Mr. Burman (United States of America) reiterated the Working Group's conclusion after lengthy debate that several specific exclusions should be deleted from draft article 2 on the grounds that States wishing to exclude them would be free to do so under draft article 18.

This is due to some ambiguity as to both the positive scope of application of the latter and the explicit exclusions from its scope.

Several exclusions exist in principal the Convention applies to listed chemicals that may cause death, temporary incapacitation or permanent harm to humans or animals.

In many replies received, article 3(2) is found acceptable as covering the gap that might arise due to the exclusions in article 3(1).

The investment on people, the construction of an active welfare state through the modernisation of the European social model, with cohesion and a labour market without exclusions.

Any additional exclusions based on competing policy objectives should be limited in number and in scope, should be clearly stated in the law and should be adopted only after their potential benefit has been carefully weighed against the social and economic policy underlying the secured transactions law of promoting the availability of low cost credit.

The broad formulation of the chapeau of draft article 2, paragraph 1, was one of the reasons why the Working Group had decided to remove some of the earlier explicit exclusions.

Notwithstanding such exclusions of open ended application, States could declare under draft paragraph 3 that they would apply the convention to specific instruments in addition to those listed in draft paragraph 1.

Mr. Madrid Parra (Spain) said that his delegation did not support the proposal to retain draft paragraph 6, not because it did not agree with exclusions but simply because exclusions were already provided for in draft article 2, paragraph 2, which stated that the convention did not apply to any transferable document or instrument that entitled the bearer or beneficiary to claim the delivery of goods or the payment of a sum of money.

Given that the application of rules of electronic commerce was in its early stages, many exclusions by Contracting States were likely at the outset but the need for them would decrease over time.

Some agreements allow countries to exclude whole sectors from their coverage (while the GATS allows no a priori exclusion), while others tend to contain sectoral exclusions that are wider than those in the GATS.

Product exclusions were also raised as an issue in this regard, as well as the need to keep such product lists to a bare minimum and to have them only to the extent necessary.

Upon consideration of the various views expressed, it was agreed that it would be preferable to allow for exclusions under paragraph (2) rather than to encourage enacting States to make use of public policy exceptions.