On 2 June 2003, Mr. Choi filed an appeal.

No form of appeal or other judicial initiative was filed.

It was after this refusal that the father filed his appeal.

To date, no form of appeal or other judicial initiative has been filed.

Her appeal was ultimately dismissed as having been filed outside the statutory deadline.

On 29 October 2002, they filed a cassation appeal in the Minsk City Court the appeal was dismissed on 28 November 2002.

The author filed an appeal with the Constitutional Court, which was rejected on 25 January 1999.

The author filed several procedural motions to reopen the proceedings and to appeal before the Supreme Court.

2.7 On 21 May 2003, DRC filed an appeal with the Regional Public Prosecutor of Copenhagen ( the Prosecutor ).

He then filed an appeal in the Prague Town Court, which quashed this decision on 5 May 2004.

Likewise, the Appeals Court Prosecutor should have filed an appeal against the decision, rather than concluding not to.

The author filed an appeal with the Provincial High Court of Oviedo, which was rejected on 3 October 1998.

The Appeals Chamber and the pre appeal judge issued several pre appeal decisions and two decisions on motions for admission of additional evidence under rule 115 filed by the appellant.

2.2 The author filed an appeal in the Supreme Court (Tribunal Supremo) alleging violations of procedural guarantees and substantive rights.

The lawyers acting on behalf of Mr. El Derini filed a second appeal (appeal No. 18140 2004), following which the State Security Emergency Court ordered his release on 8 June 2004.

The authors filed an appeal before the Constitutional Court for amparo, claiming a violation of the principle of equality of arms.

On 3 February 1995, the Superior Court admitted the appeal filed by the company against the judgement of 12 July 1994.

The author subsequently abandoned his appeal and filed for compensation for unlawful detention, but he never received a reply from the authorities.

When his complaint was rejected at the lower court and appeal levels, the author filed an application for amparo with the Constitutional Court.

The author filed an appeal for unification of doctrine before the Employment Division of the High Court, which dismissed it on 10 June 1997.

If a formal review letter is prepared before the appeal is filed, that letter may serve as the respondent's reply or may become an integral part of it

At present, at least five serious crimes cases remain pending before the Court of Appeal and it is expected that additional appeals will be filed by 20 May 2005.

2.4 The authors filed an appeal for unification of doctrine with the Supreme Court, which was rejected on 13 January 1998 on the grounds that the decision in question was not identical to the one with which it was being contrasted under the appeal.

5.10 The author rejects the State party's assertion that he has not indicated the amount of his Swiss pension, noting that it was stated in the appeal filed with the Constitutional Court.

2.9 On 15 July 1998, the author filed an appeal against the District's court decision (of 30 June 1998) in the Tashkent City Court and on 10 September, the City Court upheld the decision.

The author filed a counter claim.

Complaints regarding detention of individuals are filed

The one individual claim that was not filed through the Palestinian late claims programme was originally filed in the regular filing period for individual claims.

2.6 After yet another unsuccessful appeal to the Ministry of Interior, the author filed a complaint for denial of justice in the Constitutional Court which, by judgement of 25 September 1997, ordered the Ministry of Interior to cease its continuing inaction which violated the complainant's rights.

The same day, the author filed an appeal with the Judicial Council of the Appeals Court, arguing that as the three suspects had posed no threat to the safety of the officers, there could be no question of self defence and Mr. Celal's death was accordingly unlawful.

Following an appeal filed by the defence, the Appeals Chamber, in its decision of 28 September 2004 and reasons on 22 October 2004, disqualified the judges engaged in the trial and ordered that the trial start de novo before a newly constituted Trial Chamber (see para.

Accordingly, Mr. Bohsali filed for fraud against the author.

2.7 On 28 June 1999, the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal.

Later, and fairly recently, acquitted on appeal in fact, on the second appeal.

We filed the patent for her, the National Innovation Foundation.

They filed a petition against this practice of admission quotas.

On 6 October 2000, upon appeal, the Borgarting Court of Appeal upheld this decision.

Charges were filed against 9 women for possession of forged passport.

Some individuals and entities have filed multiple lawsuits challenging their listing.

The seller filed an action for the payment of the price.

In 2013, for example, resident inventors in Germany filed some 917 patent applications for every million inhabitants. Resident inventors in Greece, by contrast, filed just 69 patent applications for every million.

The Court of Appeal of Quebec rejected the appeal against the conviction and the Supreme Court of Canada refused the application for leave to appeal against this decision.

Based on 2005 Appeal should there be a need to launch another appeal during 2006 2007

He won the appeal.

the right to appeal.