Case studies on the violation of women's rights

In the case of a violation, the treaty body requests the State party to take appropriate steps to remedy the violation.

In the case of violation the head of the family will be arrested and punished.

Specific case studies were developed for each incident of violation and the respective chain of network.

The facts of this case remain too obscure to permit a finding of violation of the Covenant.

The State party reiterates that there has been no violation of the Covenant in this case.

The State party concludes that no violation of article 10 occurred in the author apos s case.

It is no longer a case simply of health but of human rights and the violation of those rights.

The Committee therefore concluded that the facts before it disclosed a violation of article 26. In case No.

A violation of article 9 (2) was also found in case No. 635 1995 (E. Morrisson v. Jamaica).

Therefore, in the circumstances of the case, the Committee, finds a violation of article 9, paragraph 4, of the Covenant.

In addition, the case was heard by the Commerce Law Division of the District Court as a registry case , allegedly in violation of applicable rules of Polish civil procedure.

The State party concludes that there has been no violation of article 26 of the Covenant in the present case.

We therefore cannot agree that the conclusion of a violation of the Covenant can be sustained in the present case.

In the present case, the Committee concludes that there has been a violation of article 14, paragraph 3 (d).

This bank robbery, a violation of a federal statute... gave the F.B.I. jurisdiction to come in on the case.

Child labour laws should be enforced, a system of inspection established, complaints investigated and severe penalties imposed in case of violation.

The Special Rapporteur sent an alleged case of a violation of the right to life of a lawyer to the Government of Kenya.

1119 2002 (Lee v. The Republic of Korea), where the Committee found a violation of article 22, paragraph 1. In case No.

A violation of the presumption of innocence was found in case No. 577 1994 (Polay Campos v. Peru) (see para. 467 above).

The State party concludes that there has thus been no violation of article 14, paragraph 1, of the Covenant in the instant case.

When a violation of human rights law occurs, it may be a sign of inadequate implementation but that is not necessarily the case.

The practices in question are most often the violation of a woman's right to physical and moral integrity, as in the case of

In any case, the participation of armed military personnel in demonstrations in the buffer strip would be in violation of military agreement No. 1.

In any case, the safe haven being given to the fugitive is in clear violation of paragraph 2 of Security Council resolution 1373 (2001).

In its view, there had not been any case of violation of the resolution by the Japanese industry since the adoption of resolution 46 215.

(c) Take measures to ensure that a finding of this Committee of a violation of article 3 be considered as sufficient grounds to review a case

The Committee considers that the information before it is not sufficient to establish a violation of article 7 in the author apos s case.

It may be committed by a State agent, in which case it may representrepresents a violation of human rights law. Alternatively, it may be committed by a non State agent, in which case there will be no violation of human rights law unless the State, in the circumstances, was required to protect the victim from the act or omission.

I would thus come to the conclusion, in the instant case, that the complainant's expulsion did not constitute a violation of article 3 of the Convention.

21.5 In the case of any violation of this contract not covered by section 21.1 (a) hereof, or in lieu of suspension or termination under section 21.1 hereof, the Council may impose upon the Contractor monetary penalties proportionate to the seriousness of the violation.

7.5 The State party denies that the procedures established by law and their application in the instant case amounted to a violation of article 14.

In the current case, the sentence of death of the author's son was passed, and subsequently carried out, in violation of the right to a fair trial as set out in article 14 of the Covenant, and therefore also in violation of article 6 of the Covenant.

3.1 The author claims a violation of article 14, paragraph 5, of the Covenant because he could not get a re evaluation of the evidence in his case.

7.1 The State party, by submission of 27 July 1995, denies that there has been a violation of article 7 of the Covenant in the authors apos case.

The State party concludes that its investigating authority proceeded actively and energetically towards solving the case and that no violation of article 9 has taken place.

It is further submitted that the delay in this case is on its own sufficient to constitute a violation of articles 7 and 10, paragraph 1.

It is also submitted that the delay in this case is on its own sufficient to constitute a violation of articles 7 and 10, paragraph 1.

In any case, there is no doubt that this is a massive and flagrant violation of human rights to which Governments cannot turn a blind eye.

I do not consider that the Committee apos s finding of a violation of article 9, paragraph 3, in the instant case (see paragraph 12) is sufficiently persuasive.

The uncertain state of the record in this case does not provide the basis for adequate consideration of the issue, or even for a sui generis finding of violation.

Should the Committee consider the case sufficiently substantiated, the State party submits that the author has failed to demonstrate a violation of any of the provisions of the Covenant.

The Committee concludes that no prima facie case of violation of the Convention has been established in respect of this part of the communication, and that, therefore, it is equally inadmissible.

In case No. 1207 2003 (Malakhovsky v. Belarus), the Committee considered whether the State party's refusal to register a religious association amounted to a violation of the Covenant.

In the present case, paragraphs 1 and 9 of section IV should express grave concern about or urge an end to practices that were in violation of international humanitarian or human rights law or in violation of the law of armed conflict and the Convention on the Rights of the Child .