European Court of Human Rights

A note on a court decision rendered by the European Court of Justice.

European Court of Human Rights 34 36 11

Greece, European Court of Human Rights, Series A. No.

Trinidad and Tobago European Court of Human Rights, Loizidou v. Turkey.

12.21 Before the European Court, the applicants claimed that Turkey had violated, inter alia, article 3 of the European Convention.

Questions of responsibility of the European Community for conduct held by member States were discussed by the European Court of Justice.

An analogous result was reached by the European Court in the Dudgeon case.

Statement by the President of the European Union on the International Criminal Court

Professor Schrijver provided an international law perspective on sanctions and commented on two sanctions related cases that had been before the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of First Instance.

Symposiun on Spain's responsibility before the International Criminal Court , organised in collaboration with the European NGO Coalition for the International Criminal Court.

Judgment of 15 July 1964, Case 6 64, European Court Reports (1964), p. 585.

2.7 The first author submitted a complaint to the European Court of Human Rights.

European Court for Human Rights, applications nos. 5095 71, 5920 72 and 5926 72.

Judgment of 15 July 1964, Case 6 64, European Court Reports (1964), p. 585.

This view has been tested and rejected by the European Court of Human Rights.

A European seminar organized by the French Association of Juvenile and Family Court magistrates.

The Court will also resolve any disputes between member States and the European Commission.

A decision in two joined cases before the Court of First Instance of the European Court of Justice is expected on 21 September 2005.

1996 1998 nominated candidate for position of Judge of The European Court of Human Rights

The effectiveness of that remedy had been recognized by the European Court of Human Rights.

7 European Court of Human Rights, Judgement No. 66289 01, Py v. France (see www.echr.coe.int).

This possibility was acknowledged by the European Court of Justice in the case Parliament v.

The pending Bosphorus case before the European Court of Human Rights may provide an illustration.

In 1990, it had recognized the compulsory jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights.

Equally, member States are bound by the European Convention and their actions are submitted to the supervision of the European Court of Human Rights.

The only institution that does have that power is the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg. But Germany s Constitutional Court can judge whether the actions of EU institutions are compatible with its constitution and the European Union treaties.

The Government signed the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and its Protocols, thereby accepting the competence of the European Commission and European Court of Human Rights.

The provision was examined, and complaints against it declared manifestly ill founded, by the European Court.

The Commission, like the European Court of Human Rights, has never called in question this principle,

At least five cases challenging the implementation of the United Nations sanctions are pending before the Court of First Instance of the European Court of Justice.

Cyprus v. Turkey, judgement of the European Court of Human Rights of 10 May, 2001, application no.

It refers to the decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Lacko et al. v.

Moreover, their claim regarding the IG Farben shares was not examined by the European Court at all.

European Court of Human Rights, Hadjianastassiou v. Greece, judgement of 16 December 1992, Series A, No. 252.

European Court of Human Rights, application No. 56811 00 (Amrollahi v. Denmark), Judgement of 11 July 2002.

In his appeal, the author cited the Piersak case decided by the European Court of Human Rights.

For example, a number of Member States contested the ability of the EC to join the European Convention on Human Rights before the European Court of Justice.

The European Court of Human Rights had no jurisdiction to pronounce on acts of the European Community as the Community was not a party to the Convention.

Three of the other parents in the national court suit, and the NHA, decided to bring their complaint to the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter denominated ECHR)).

8.5 However, the European Court was able to examine the same matter only insofar as the substantive rights protected under the European Convention converge with those protected under the Covenant, and to the extent that the events complained occurred prior to 18 May 1999, when the author filed his application with the European Court.

The author refers to the European Court of Human Right's case of De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium.

It has been resorted to, for example, by the Iran United States Claims Tribunal, the European Court of

Iran statement by the Presidency on behalf of European Union leaders meeting at Hampton Court, 27 October 2005

Judgment of 26 February 1986, Case 175 84, European Court Reports (1986), p. 753 at p. 768, para.