adopting a process to bring the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty into effect

The removal of reservations to international treaties is subject to Australia's domestic treaty process.

In the nuclear arena, it fully observes the provisions of the Treaty on the Non Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and supports the strengthened treaty review process.

They highlighted the challenge of streamlining the reporting process without neglecting the specificities of each treaty.

They highlighted the challenge of streamlining the reporting process without neglecting the specificities of each treaty.

Lithuania considers the Treaty an essential instrument in the global architecture of the nuclear disarmament process.

The indefinite extension of the Treaty on the Non Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and accompanying decisions adopted in 1995 included a commitment to a strengthened Treaty review process.

It is a matter of utmost importance to maintain the integrity of the Treaty and enhance the confidence, transparency and credibility of the Treaty process, possible only by acting in good faith and fulfilling the Treaty obligations.

At the very least the mechanisms for the review process for the Non Proliferation Treaty did work.

Latvia considers the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty a very important element of the nuclear disarmament process.

Reaffirms the importance of all States parties to the Treaty on the Non Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons1 complying with their obligations under all the articles of the Treaty, and stresses the importance of an effective Treaty review process

1. Reaffirms the importance of all States parties to the Treaty on the Non Proliferation of Nuclear WeaponsUnited Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 729, No. 10485. complying with their obligations under all the articles of the Treaty, and stresses the importance of an effective Treaty review process

The Paris Principles highlight the importance for NHRIs to engage in the international human rights treaty body process.

Additional resources are proposed to support the work of the treaty bodies, develop strategies to harmonize working methods and streamline reporting procedures of treaty bodies, as well as to strengthen national capacity and engage in the treaty implementation and monitoring process.

The indefinite extension of the Treaty and accompanying decisions in 1995 included a commitment to a strengthened review process.

Several participants underscored that the expertise developed by the treaty bodies must not be lost in any harmonization process.

Poland supports the strengthened review process of the Treaty as adopted during the 1995 NPT review and extension conference.

National implementation of treaty body recommendations will continue to be strengthened through the organization of training workshops addressed to States parties to international human rights treaties, with the aim of involving national actors in the treaty body reporting and implementation process, strengthening the participation of civil society in the work of the treaty bodies and enhancing the overall reporting process.

(Final document of the 2000 Review Conference and decision 1, Strengthening the Review Process for the Treaty adopted in 1995).

(a) Consider the further strengthening or enhancement of the review process, including with regard to new institutions of the Treaty

Several participants underscored that the expertise developed by the existing treaty bodies must not be lost in any harmonization process.

Presentations included the following topics depositary process treaty implementation and reporting requirements of human rights treaties and reservations and declarations.

Collective understandings of what the article VI obligation means in practice have been gradually developed through the Treaty review process.

Requests all Islamic countries party to the Treaty to actively participate in the preparatory process for the 2010 NPT Review Conference.

Here a distinction might be made between subsequent treaties that may affect the application of the treaty to be interpreted (the process of the actualization or contemporization of the latter treaty) and those that may affect the interpretation of the treaty itself, that is to say, cases where the concepts in the treaty are themselves not static but evolutionary .

The Treaty on the Non Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) has to rely for its implementation on a five yearly review process.

It would be worthwhile exploring the nature of the treaty in question, because it was an objective criterion facilitating the determination process.

Moreover, as a Contracting Party, the Kingdom of Morocco has consistently supported the decisions aimed at strengthening the review process of the Treaty.

In this context, Poland follows the practice of reporting on the implementation of the Treaty as an important element of the review process.

Recalling also that, on 11 May 1995, the 1995 Review and Extension Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons adopted three decisions on strengthening the review process for the Treaty, principles and objectives for nuclear non proliferation and disarmament, and extension of the Treaty,

Recalling also that, on 11 May 1995, the 1995 Review and Extension Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons adopted three decisions on strengthening the review process for the Treaty, principles and objectives for nuclear non proliferation and disarmament, and extension of the Treaty,

This gave us hope that the issue of a fissile material treaty would have the required political backing and leadership during the negotiation process.

Poland has always underlined the importance of the process of strengthening the IAEA safeguards system, considering the additional protocols to be integral parts of the IAEA safeguards system for the treaty and mandatory for State parties to the Treaty.

The States parties will continue their endeavours to strengthen the review process of the operation of the Treaty, with a view to assuring that the purposes of the preamble and the provisions of the Treaty in their entirety are being realized.

Welcoming the announcements made on substantial reductions in nuclear arsenals, he said that the Treaty between the United States and the Russian Federation on Strategic Offensive Reductions (Moscow Treaty) was a positive step in the process of nuclear de escalation.

Guatemala had submitted its national report on compliance with the Treaty, and his Government had signed and was in the process of ratifying the CTBT.

The process of reviewing the progress attained in implementing the Mine Ban Treaty, which had come into force five years previously, was getting under way.

As Australia's treaties process requires all necessary legislation implementing a treaty to be in place before Australia becomes a party to a treaty, Australia will only be in a position to accede to the MARPLEX Convention once this legislation has been adopted.

Attempts to curb the rights deeply rooted in the Treaty amount to an amendment of the Treaty and fall far beyond the mandate of the review process as envisaged in paragraph 3 Article VIII and decision of the 1995 Review and Extension Conference.

We believe, though, that the increased use of qualified majority voting by member governments embodied in the new treaty should also be applied to the ratification process itself. That way, if a small minority of EU governments prove unable to ratify the treaty, it would not be torpedoed the way that its predecessor, the Constitutional Treaty, was in 2005.

Recalling also that on 11 May 1995, the Review and Extension Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons adopted three decisions on strengthening the review process for the Treaty, principles and objectives for nuclear non proliferation and disarmament, and extension of the Treaty on the Non Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons,

Recalling also that on 11 May 1995, the Review and Extension Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons adopted three decisions on strengthening the review process for the Treaty, principles and objectives for nuclear non proliferation and disarmament, and extension of the Treaty on the Non Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons,

Welcoming the significant progress achieved in nuclear weapon reductions made unilaterally or bilaterally under the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) process, as a step towards nuclear disarmament,

Urging States parties to exert all possible efforts to ensure a successful and productive preparatory process for the 2010 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty,

This report clearly demonstrates Argentina's commitment to the principle of submitting periodic reports under Article VI within the context of the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty review process.